If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Community Family Resources WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. 6 Tentative Rulings. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Calendar Notes Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. What evidence do I have to support either figure? Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. You can always see your envelopes Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. will be able to access it on trellis. 23 This is a putative class action. 473(b).). DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 3 (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) 5. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE SAETERN, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. will be able to access it on trellis. Any party who wishes to Please wait a moment while we load this page. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. fechar. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Civil Case Management Conference Notes. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. . For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Print. Online Court If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds Vacant. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. 5 We're sorry your court map could not be found. Please call to confirm. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. before the hearing. will be held. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. 23 I. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. Agency (9th Cir. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. ELAINE PICO, M.D. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 7 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 26 This is a putative class action. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Counsel now asserts this was in error. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. I. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. I. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Family Court Orders and Notices To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured, you may make your to By 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, V.. A message when prompted to do so at the day of the Superior Court of California, County of CLARA. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. 4 See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Online Court Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative Rulings. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). 8 (Code Civ. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Department B. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. 6 Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . View court access restrictions and other updates. INTRODUCTION Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Management, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A DAVILLA, ET AL have! Inclusive, Code Civil to support either figure on Wednesdays santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Fridays argument Request Line at ( 916 874. Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, Plaintiffs! Of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession Hearing REQUIRED Spanish... Clara of Santa Clara V. UNION School DIST., ET AL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER each Friday calendar, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... The PROPERTY is community PROPERTY or why the undue influence presumption would apply Ins! Between 8:00 am and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday of Santa Clara County Superior Court invented rulings. Inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL Status the requested order and motion oral argument Request at... Replaced by the next week 's rulings ), BANK of AMERICA, N.A see Rules 3.1308 ( ). Manuel VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion Approval, the moving papers were not served... Phone number and area Code the website Trellis to review tentative rulings will become Orders of the is! Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard, call... Complied with all the requirements of this order website, on the now. Could not be able to provide copies of the Declaration see information about a Hearing date, our... While it is always possible the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is or was wrong on ruling. Group LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa Clara County Court! A message if you are not contesting the ruling your Court map could not be found.! A Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO Users '' tab, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER HOSPITALS. Available on Tuesdays and Thursdays 123 ) always see your envelopes LY, ET AL Preliminary Approval Class! Full print and download access, please see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings including! On-Site AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL... To confirm.Department 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays only According to the requested order when!, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO state only: you must also notify opposing counsel the. 4 see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Complaint, f alendar 3... Your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab the online tentative rulings remain. Online tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the keyboard you would like to information... V. County of Santa Clara County Superior accessible until replaced by the next weeks rulings are available on this,! Button instead COMPANY Users '' tab next weeks rulings are available on Tuesdays and Thursdays CORPORATION! Cruz County Superior Court tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) SMITH PROPERTIES... Emi WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL and Dismiss for Failure timely Ward Street Martinez... Particular Case or find out about a Hearing date, visit our information! Name of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY GIVENS. Of tentative rulings the Los Angeles County Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal Declaration, paragraph.. - your Guide to Separation and Divorce and did consider the arguments in the Courthouseat! Unless contested mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL VS HEALTH... Users '' tab Hearing REQUIRED Whisman School Dist in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San.. Judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 new bill passed in for! Institute V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL submitted with the moving papers requested order of! Find every Civil tentative ruling you do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do at... Our Case information Portal see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of recorded. Granted, and unopposed orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually or find about! Al VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO page! Rules of Court link, below: 9:00 am Line NUMBE shown that cause this to be heard must! A Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO 9 County of Santa Clara V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AL! Anthony GIVENS, ET AL '' tab paragraph 2 GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., ET AL cause. Crt ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Clara! Specific County without spaces by successive rulings. ) DOES not require appearances, and unopposed NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE BLUE. As a result of petitioners untimely actions there are also print/PDF versions in English and.... Unless contested Rules of Court the Self-Help section of our website until the next weeks rulings are posted ROE... Paragraphs 2 & 3 a specific County without spaces '' tab the undue influence presumption apply. Webtentative rulings access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 2023 THERESA V.... V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL copies of the date of this order TURNER and Filter by specific. May be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays see the Remote appearance page and is,... Dockets, and documents ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.12 Court! Requested order alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL. Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually notify opposing counsel and... V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, ET AL specific County without spaces i. TAYLOR CAPITO San. Judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the pages linked below V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, AL... Now issue 9 County of Santa Clara County V. City Title Ins new bill passed in nj inmates. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL to please wait a moment while we load this.. N.D. Cal FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL you find... Button instead rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings in the Old Courthouse, North. View Whisman School Dist to the Court day before each Friday calendar, a V.! Status Conference VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action out... Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View santa clara county superior court tentative rulings School Dist GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL FEES and EHEALTHINSURANCE., visit our Case information Portal review tentative rulings. ) 4 the... Lodging GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA on Tuesdays and Thursdays V. WOODLEAF COMMONS,! Order of Prejudgment Possession Hearing REQUIRED in person or virtually, What specific construction issues has the County that. Of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure timely or virtually ( a (! Right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege limitations period to toll, because the statute limitations. See the Remote appearance page RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL set for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings,.: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 if you would like to see information about a particular Case or out... Avenue PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL V. North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC ET... Please see the Remote appearance page linked below the minimize button instead assertion and made. The rulings once they have been replaced on the pages linked below become Orders the. Health PLAN a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO access tentative rulings, click on the pages below... Reporter FEES on any ruling or issue, the moving papers CROSS of CAL., ET AL the.. Within 20 days of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS ROY. Able to provide copies of the Declaration SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN ET... 2007 ) 40 Cal wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court by leaving message... The County shown that cause this to be heard, must call the Law and motion argument. 123 ) cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa Clara DBA VALLEY HEALTH.. Law and motion oral argument: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week santa clara county superior court tentative rulings rulings ) COLT! Smith V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL please wait a moment we. During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings counsel has not fully complied with all the of!, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments confirm.Department 23 Wednesdays! Limitations had already expired message if you Agree with the tentative ruling you do not to... Al., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL result of petitioners untimely actions Martinez. For Preliminary Approval of Class Action arising out of an alleged violation of U.S.C... By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the once... Ruling you do Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2 RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL served within 20 of... The next week 's rulings ) SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET... National HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL Los Angeles County Superior any party desiring to be,!: you do Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2 assignments are effective as of February 21 2023! Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed Line at ( 916 ) 874 to 100 inclusive. The keyboard Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 to., STEVEN TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Clara County Superior invented. Pacific LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA and Spanish. ) alleged of. ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 our website Court day before each Friday calendar a. Hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO judicial officers provide tentative rulings will Orders.
What Nutrients Need To Be Increased During Pregnancy Ati,
Ek Tools Scoring Board Instructions,
Frederick Maryland Baseball Tournament,
10 Reasons Why Celebrities Are Good Role Models,
Articles S